Equipping nonprofits to advance social change

The Golden State Difference

New Report Says CA Leads When It Comes to Diversity in Nonprofit Leadership, But Barriers Persist

Written by Frances Kunreuther and Sean Thomas-Breitfeld

Following its groundbreaking national report on why America’s nonprofit sector has so few leaders of color, the Building Movement Project (BMP) released California’s Race to Lead; The Racial Leadership Gap in the Golden State, a report examining the diversity of nonprofit leadership in the Golden State—a state widely acknowledged as a bellwether because of its diverse population and progressive values.

A deep-dive into survey responses from more than 800 California nonprofit staff members, California’s Race to Lead shows there is indeed a “Golden State difference” for its nonprofit sector, according to BMP. Respondents of color from California were more positive about their nonprofit work than were people of color in other states

Given that people of color have constituted a majority of the state’s population for more than two decades, “California is particularly interesting—this data offers leaders in other states a glimpse into what the U.S. workforce will look like in another generation,” said Frances Kunreuther, Co-Director of BMP. Other reports examining the nonprofit sector in California show that the state is home to more than 250,000 nonprofits, with 25 percent led by people of color, compared to less than 20 percent nationwide.

California’s Race to Lead; The Racial Leadership Gap in the Golden State compares the responses by California nonprofit staff members with more than 3,200 responses from nonprofit staff members in all other states, all of which were compiled in 2017 for BMP’s groundbreaking report entitled Race to Lead; Confronting the Nonprofit Racial Leadership Gap.

By segmenting California respondents for the new report, BMP found that nonprofit leaders of color in the Golden State reported fewer barriers to advancement than people of color in other states and less frustration caused by the lack of role models. Further, white respondents in California were more likely than those in other states to agree that aspiring leaders of color faced structural barriers, indicating that California white respondents were more aware of obstacles than whites in other states. Indeed, on almost every indicator, people of color in the state reported less frustration and more support in their work. They also had a more positive view of how their organizations were addressing issues of diversity and race.

“BMP’s closer look at the California data showed that the Golden State has made progress on increasing nonprofit leadership diversity, with findings clearly pointing to gains for people of color when compared to other states, but inequities remain,” said Sean Thomas-Breitfeld, Co-Director of BMP.

“Almost 30 percent of Californians of color responding to the survey reported that their race had a negative impact on their career advancement, a disturbing finding even though it is nine percentage points less than people of color in other states,” Thomas-Breitfeld said. Additionally, white respondents reported earning higher salaries than people of color.

BMP conducted focus groups in California to gather a deeper understanding of the inequities people of color face as they advance in their nonprofit careers. For instance, the data revealed that 78 percent of respondents of color in California agreed that recruiters do not do enough to identify qualified people of color for top level nonprofit positions. One African American focus group participant said, “I think there is always a person of color finalist who never gets chosen, it’s almost like a setup.”

In many ways, the findings in California’s Race to Lead, build on the 2006 Greenlining Institute report, which showed a lack of philanthropic dollars going to people of color communities in California. In the wake of the Greenlining report, state legislation was proposed to require foundations to share race-related information. Instead, nine large California foundations volunteered to invest more than $30 million to increase funding for people of color communities and to promote leadership diversity. The efforts have been widely praised.

“But more can be done,” Kunreuther said. California’s Race to Lead; The Racial Leadership Gap in the Golden State offers specific recommendations to build on the progress made so far, including investing in leadership support for people of color-led nonprofit organizations and studying the reasons why people of color choose leadership roles.

“Little is known about what groups people of color lead in California, their pathways to leadership, how long they stay and their career ladder,” the report states. “This data is invaluable to understand – and to change—barriers to POC leadership” in California and beyond.

Read and share the full report here and the executive summary here.

Leadership leadership development nonprofit sector race race to lead racial leadership gap